Jasmine Crockett Unseals The John Kennedy 1970 IQ Wharton Aptitude Test Genius Think A
TOTAL ANNIHILATION: Jasmine Crockett Unseals Kennedy’s Aptitude Test, Shattering His ‘Genius’ Persona
The Senate chamber fell into stunned silence as Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) stood at the podium. Her mission: to dismantle the carefully constructed public persona of Senator
What followed was the systematic unraveling of one of Washington’s most recognized characters, exposing the dangerous hypocrisy of a political figure who used a fabricated intellectual history to “dismiss and demean”
I. The Weaponization of the ‘Simple Country Lawyer’ Persona
John Kennedy had perfected the art of appearing as a humble “simple country lawyer” while strategically referencing his Ivy League background (Oxford, Virginia Law) to wield intellectual authority. This persona allowed him to subtly—or not so subtly—talk down to opponents while appearing relatable to his base.
The Confrontation of Hypocrisy
Crockett, a civil rights attorney with a Harvard Law degree, argued that Kennedy’s calculated performance had gone too far, especially after he condescendingly told her that she needed to “worry less about impressing us with big words and more about actually understanding how the real world works.”
Crockett’s move was strategic: she had learned that Kennedy’s self-proclaimed genius status was the shield behind which he practiced intellectual bullying.
The Justification: Crockett asserted that while she does not believe “standardized tests from 50 years ago define a person’s worth,” the American people deserve the truth when someone
The Legal Defense
When Kennedy’s allies protested that the academic records were private, Crockett calmly presented her legal justification, stating that her office secured the files through
As Senator Elizabeth Warren added: “If he uses his educational background as a sword, he cannot then use privacy as a shield when that background is examined.”
II. The Shattering Revelations: Bottom 30%
Crockett then delivered the contents of the file, shattering Kennedy’s reputation with academic facts:
The Score: Senator Kennedy scored in the bottom 30% of all applicants on the Wharton aptitude assessment
The chamber erupted. Kennedy’s accent momentarily vanished, replaced by the standard American accent of someone panicking. His carefully constructed facade was visibly cracking on national television.
III. Consequences and the Dangers of Fabrication
The revelation fundamentally undermined Kennedy’s authority, exposing his intellectual superiority as a “false narrative of intellectual superiority” designed to “intimidate others and shut down debate.”
The Pattern of Dismissal
Crockett projected a final board showing the faces of over a dozen expert witnesses, including Nobel Prize-winning economists and distinguished public health experts, whose expertise Kennedy had publicly dismissed using his claimed Oxford-trained knowledge.
The Real Consequence: The revelation made clear that Kennedy used his misrepresentation not just for political gain, but as a systematic weapon against those with differing policy views, particularly women and people of color.
The Call for Authenticity
Crockett’s final statement became a defining moment for political ethics:
“This isn’t about whether Senator Kennedy is intelligent or capable. It’s about honesty in public service.
The confrontation successfully challenged a system where claimed intellectual authority and credentials often override the substantive expertise and experiences of others. Kennedy, stripped of his signature political weapon, was left diminished, while Crockett became a national symbol for the demand of authenticity in public service.
Senator John Kennedy Drops Bomb on Chuck Schumer: “He’ll Fold Like a Cheap Tent”
Senator John Kennedy is once again cutting through Washington’s theatrics with brutal honesty.
The Louisiana Republican accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of staging political drama instead of doing his job to reopen the government.
In an interview with Fox Business host Larry Kudlow, Kennedy described the shutdown as a “political performance,” not a genuine policy disagreement.
He said Schumer is more concerned with keeping up appearances for his party’s radical wing than with serving the American people.
“It will end eventually,” Kennedy said, “when Senator Schumer goes to six or eight of his members and Democrats and says, ‘Do me a favor. Vote to open it back up. I may have to criticize you. I’m not going to vote with you, but I need a way out of this.’”
Kennedy made clear that Schumer’s priority isn’t compromise — it’s saving face.
“He’s gonna tell ‘em, ‘Now, look, I gotta vote no. And I gotta dogcuss you a little bit. We gotta have some play acting and make this look good. And then we come out of the shutdown,’” Kennedy said, describing how Schumer will secretly orchestrate the outcome he publicly opposes.
According to Kennedy, the government shutdown is less about real disagreements and more about political optics. Schumer, he said, is acting out a script to appease the far-left members of his caucus — what Kennedy calls the “moon wing” of the Democratic Party.
“I know him. Well, this shutdown is not about policy. It’s about politics,” Kennedy said.
“And Senator Schumer, this is what’s going on. He is trying to get the moon wing, the socialist wing of the Democratic Party, which is in control, to love him. And they will never love him.”
That blunt assessment paints a damning picture of the Democratic leadership. Schumer, Kennedy argues, is beholden to extremists who refuse to compromise, even at the expense of the country.
The Louisiana senator said Schumer’s strategy is simple: keep the government closed until Republicans and President Trump agree to hand over billions in new spending — spending that Democrats will control. “What he’s saying,” Kennedy explained, “is we’re going to keep government shut down until you Republicans and President Trump give the Democrats $1.5 trillion, and they’re going to tell us how to spend it.”
Kennedy ridiculed the idea that Schumer is fighting for “the people.” In his view, Schumer is fighting for power, money, and media attention — and the shutdown is just another stage for him to perform on.
“He’s boning if it looks contrived,” Kennedy warned. “He can’t look like he’s having a mutiny.” That’s why, Kennedy says, Schumer must choreograph his next steps carefully, pretending to fight while quietly coordinating votes behind the scenes.
Kennedy’s description of this “play acting” matches what many Americans have long suspected: that the partisan battles on the Senate floor are largely theater designed to manipulate the public.
Schumer, Kennedy said, is obsessed with being seen as strong by the socialist faction of his party — even though that same faction will never accept him. “He’d be better off doing what he did back in March and just calling it like he saw it and keeping government open,” Kennedy added.
The senator’s comments came after Schumer led most Democrats in voting down the Republicans’ spending bill earlier in the week, prolonging the shutdown. Kennedy said that move was pure political posturing.
“Schumer knows exactly what he’s doing,” Kennedy said. “He’s trying to look tough for his base while still leaving himself a backdoor exit.”
Kennedy argued that Schumer is being held hostage by his own party’s extremists — the same people who demand funding for what Kennedy called “wasteful foreign projects” and ideological programs.
The Louisiana senator said Democrats are fighting to reinstate spending for overseas LGBTQ initiatives, electric buses in Rwanda, Palestinian media operations, and sterilization programs abroad — all things Republicans already removed from the budget.
“He’s not fighting for the American taxpayer,” Kennedy said. “He’s fighting for his image and for foreign projects nobody asked for.”
