TRUMP CUTS THE CORD! DONALD TRUMP IS CANCELLING ANOTHER $175,000,000.00 IN FUNDING FOR CALIFORNIA’S HIGH SPEED RAIL PROJECTS.
President Trump Targets California Mega-Project, Slashing $175 Million to Fundamentally Challenge State Priorities
Former President Donald Trump has escalated his war against California’s liberal governance, announcing a decisive move on his social media platform to cancel an additional
$175,000,000.00 in federal funding designated for the state’s troubled High Speed Rail (HSR) project. This unilateral action reinforces the President’s long-held stance that the project is a massive waste of taxpayer money and represents a fundamental rejection of California’s infrastructure priorities.
The split-screen image perfectly encapsulates the political confrontation: the determined, authoritative stance of Trump, the federal policy-cutter, set against the serious, contemplative expression of Governor Gavin Newsom, the project’s chief defender. The background—featuring the HSR and green energy turbines—visually highlights the ideological clash between the state’s progressive vision and Trump’s fiscal conservativism.
The Target: California’s Billion-Dollar Headache
The California HSR project, intended to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco, has been plagued by years of delays, ballooning budgets, and mismanagement, with estimated costs now soaring into the tens of billions of dollars.
-
Trump’s Justification: The President has consistently argued that the project is a “disaster,” a “money pit,” and serves as a symbol of government incompetence. By cancelling these funds, Trump aims to redirect federal resources away from projects he deems wasteful and towards infrastructure with broader national support.
-
Newsom’s Challenge: Governor Newsom and California Democrats rely on these federal funds to keep the project viable. The cancellation forces the state to scramble for alternative financing or face further contraction of the HSR’s already scaled-back scope. Newsom has repeatedly vowed to resist Trump’s “political sabotage.”
This latest round of funding cuts sends a clear message that the administration intends to use federal resources as a powerful leverage tool to punish political opponents and challenge state-level policy decisions.
The Political Question: Aligning the Base
The headline’s final question—“DOES TRUMP HAVE YOUR FULL SUPPORT ON THIS?”—is a deliberate rhetorical device aimed at mobilizing the Republican base, which largely views the HSR as an emblem of Democratic excess.
The action appeals directly to voters who believe the federal government should not subsidize expensive, delayed state projects, particularly in states whose policies they oppose. The move simultaneously puts Governor Newsom under immense pressure to either compromise or find a politically viable way to proceed without the promised federal support.
MUST SEE: President Trump Reveals Anonymous Person Who Wanted To Pay Troops $130 Million During Shutdown
An anonymous donor stepped in to cover $130 million in military salaries during the ongoing government shutdown, President Donald J. Trump announced Thursday.
The donation ensures that U.S. service members continue to receive paychecks despite the obstructionist Democrat-led shutdown that has paralyzed Washington.
Trump, addressing supporters, called the donor a “friend” of the military and the nation, emphasizing that the contribution was made with no desire for recognition.
“This is what true American patriots do,” Trump said, highlighting the generosity and commitment to the men and women in uniform who protect the nation every day.
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell confirmed Friday that the Department of War had accepted the $130 million donation under its general gift acceptance authority.
The funds are specifically earmarked to offset the cost of service members’ salaries and benefits, a move designed to shield troops from the chaos caused by Democratic inaction.
Millions of federal employees have already faced delayed paychecks and shuttered offices on day 24 of the shutdown, the second-longest in U.S. history.
Experts in the mainstream media and liberal think tanks have raised questions about the legality of such a donation, but conservatives argue that the priority is ensuring troops are paid, not political games.
Romina Boccia of the Cato Institute warned about congressional restrictions, but Trump’s administration is clearly focused on practical solutions rather than bureaucratic delays.
Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse, yet when Democrats choose to weaponize government shutdowns against service members, patriotism finds its own path.
The anonymous donor represents the type of American who steps up when the federal government fails, a silent hero acting in the national interest.
Under Pentagon rules, gifts above $10,000 are vetted to ensure no conflicts of interest, yet the administration has confirmed the donation passed all necessary scrutiny.
The magnitude of the gift demonstrates both the urgency of the crisis and the level of support that the American people have for the military, something Democrats consistently fail to respect.
Defense officials did not reveal whether the donor is a U.S. citizen or a foreign national, but the focus remains squarely on honoring the troops.
The government shutdown has created a humanitarian crisis for federal employees and disrupted programs, but Trump’s leadership has ensured that the military does not suffer.
Covering military pay for the first half of October cost roughly $6.5 billion. While $130 million may seem small, it represents a critical lifeline during a period of unprecedented bureaucratic gridlock.
Trump praised the anonymous donor’s patriotism, noting that this contribution directly offsets the shortfall caused by Democrats refusing to pass a spending bill.
“He called us and said, ‘I’d like to contribute personally because I love the military and I love the country,’” Trump told supporters, highlighting the personal devotion behind the donation.
By contrast, Democrats in Washington continue to stall funding bills, leaving tens of millions of Americans in uncertainty and undermining essential government operations.
Critics may argue over legality, but conservatives insist that morality and duty to the troops outweigh procedural nitpicking when soldiers are waiting for their paychecks.
The anonymous donation underscores a broader point: real Americans, not career politicians, are stepping up to protect the country and its defenders.
