THIS IS INSANE: Epstein Was Actively Coaching Democrat Lawmaker to Attack Trump’s Team
Stacey Plaskett, the Democrat Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, is now under intense scrutiny following the bombshell revelation that she was allegedly in real-time communication with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing. According to investigative reporting by The Washington Post and confirmed by The Guardian, transcripts from Epstein’s estate suggest a disturbing coordination between the disgraced financier and a sitting member of Congress during a February 2019 hearing targeting President Trump.
This stunning revelation comes from documents that include real-time text exchanges believed to be between Epstein and Plaskett as she participated in the House Oversight Committee’s questioning of Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen. Epstein’s messages appear to have influenced her line of questioning, raising questions about compromised oversight and corrupt backroom dealings.
The analysis that identified Plaskett as Epstein’s contact was conducted by matching timestamps from the texts to video footage of the hearing. The implications are damning. When Epstein texted, “Cohen brought up RONA – keeper of the secrets,” the unnamed recipient, presumably Plaskett, replied, “RONA?? Quick I’m up next is that an acronym,” clearly indicating they were preparing to speak.
When Plaskett finally questioned Cohen, she zeroed in on Rhona Graff, President Trump’s executive assistant, just as Epstein had suggested. “She is Ms. Rhona, what is Ms. Rhona’s…” Plaskett asked. Cohen responded, “Rhona Graff is Mr. Trump’s executive assistant…her office is directly next to his.”
This connection is more than troubling. It is an unprecedented breach of public trust and a flagrant violation of ethical standards. For a member of Congress to potentially receive directives from Epstein during a hearing meant to investigate President Trump is to erode the very fabric of legislative integrity.
Plaskett’s office has not denied the allegation. When contacted, her chief of staff merely stated she was “not in a position to confirm or not” whether the lawmaker had been texting with Epstein. That non-answer speaks volumes. In politics, refusal to deny is often the first stage of damage control.
The American people deserve answers. This wasn’t just a matter of poor judgment. This was a potential manipulation of federal oversight proceedings by a known child sex trafficker. The left-wing media and Democratic elites, who love to crow about transparency and justice, are eerily silent.
This same Plaskett was later appointed as an impeachment manager during Trump’s second impeachment trial. If her judgment was compromised during the Cohen hearing, how can the nation trust her role in a process that sought to convict a sitting President?
It is no exaggeration to say that this revelation should spark a congressional investigation of its own. If this were a Republican linked to Epstein in this manner, the liberal media would be calling for resignation, prosecution, and exile. Instead, we hear crickets.
What makes this more disturbing is the history Epstein had with other powerful Democrats, including Bill Clinton and others within the liberal establishment. That his influence may have extended into manipulating congressional hearings should send chills down every American’s spine.
These findings also reveal how deeply compromised the Democrats have become. They are not the party of working-class Americans. They are the party of hidden agendas, elitist coverups, and corruption cloaked in the language of virtue.
Democrats have spent years trying to paint President Trump as beholden to dark money and foreign powers. Yet here we see one of their own potentially being steered in real time by a convicted predator. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
The facts in the transcript speak for themselves. Epstein asked, “Are you chewing?” Moments later, the hearing feed cuts to Plaskett chewing her mouth. She replied, “Not anymore. Chewing interior of my mouth. Bad habit from middle school.” The timing confirms the damning overlap.
How could a sex trafficker have this level of access to a federal lawmaker during official proceedings? How does someone like Epstein even feel entitled to speak so casually to a member of Congress unless that connection was longstanding?
This debacle is not just about Stacey Plaskett. It is a window into the murky alliances that govern the Democratic machine. Epstein may be dead, but his reach into political power structures clearly lived on far longer than most would dare admit.
House Republicans must act. Investigations should be opened immediately. Subpoenas should be issued. The public has a right to know how deep Epstein’s connections went. Were others compromised? Were hearings tainted? The credibility of congressional oversight is at stake.
This scandal also highlights the glaring double standard in media coverage. If a GOP representative had engaged in this behavior, there would be breathless coverage on every network. But since it’s a Democrat, we get vague denials and buried leads.
President Trump faced relentless investigations, impeachments, and character assassinations over manufactured narratives. Meanwhile, Democrats like Plaskett allegedly conspired with one of the most reviled criminals in modern memory and received nothing but media cover.
The American people are not stupid. They see the two-tier justice system. They see the bias. And they are fed up with it. Accountability can’t wait any longer.
Fragile Truce in Middle East Shaken as Israel and Iran Exchange Missile Fire
Fragile Peace: Trump’s Cease-Fire Between Israel and Iran Tested by Renewed Missile Strikes
A tentative calm swept over the Middle East early Tuesday, as a cease-fire brokered by President Trump went into effect, promising to halt nearly two weeks of deadly conflict between Israel and Iran.
Yet the fragile truce barely held before tension flared again, as reports of new missile attacks threatened to unravel the carefully negotiated pause.
Conflicting claims from both sides have left the global community on edge, questioning whether peace can endure—or if the region is teetering on the brink of renewed war.
The Cease-Fire Announcement
The cease-fire, formalized early Tuesday morning, aimed to bring an end to 12 days of intense hostilities, which had left scores dead and many more displaced.
Both nations had publicly claimed victory in the conflict, yet the international community welcomed the diplomatic pause as a chance to prevent further escalation.
President Trump’s announcement was intended to provide a framework for restraint, urging both parties to maintain the truce and avoid actions that could reignite hostilities.
Renewed Missile Activity
Almost immediately, reports emerged suggesting the cease-fire was under strain. The Israeli military claimed Iran had launched new missile barrages, potentially violating the truce.
According to Israeli sources, at least four missiles were fired, setting off sirens and sending millions of citizens scrambling into bomb shelters.
A strike in the southern city of Beersheba tragically killed at least four people, adding urgency to the diplomatic crisis.
Iranian state media, however, denied any missile attacks, creating a murky narrative that made it difficult for international observers to determine the full scope of the violence.
Israeli authorities claimed to have neutralized missile launchers in western Iran that were allegedly poised to target Israeli territory, asserting that the country remained prepared to respond with force if the truce was breached.
The Dynamics of the Truce
Iranian state media, however, denied any missile attacks, creating a murky narrative that made it difficult for international observers to determine the full scope of the violence.
Israeli authorities claimed to have neutralized missile launchers in western Iran that were allegedly poised to target Israeli territory, asserting that the country remained prepared.
Initially, Israel maintained a cautious silence, adhering to a long-standing practice of observing whether calm from the other side would hold before formally acknowledging the end of hostilities.
By mid-morning, both nations publicly confirmed the cease-fire: Israel highlighted that it had achieved its objectives in coordination with Trump, while Iran framed the truce as a demonstration of its military success.
Despite this formal acknowledgment, the early hours of peace proved precarious. Within two hours, sirens sounded again in northern Israel, warning of additional missile launches.
Israeli military officials accused Iran of violating the truce, signaling a readiness to respond militarily, and underscoring how fragile the diplomatic arrangement truly was.
red to respond with force if the truce was breached.
Human and Regional Impact
For civilians on the ground, the truce offered little immediate relief.
Families huddled in shelters, schools and workplaces shut down, and emergency services were stretched thin responding to both real and potential threats.
The psychological toll of constant missile warnings compounded the physical destruction caused during the preceding 12 days of conflict
Neighboring countries monitored developments closely, concerned that instability between Israel and Iran could have broader regional consequences. Oil markets, already sensitive to Middle East tensions, reacted to the reports of renewed strikes, while diplomatic channels scrambled to verify claims and encourage restraint.
The Trump Factor
President Trump’s involvement as a mediator added an unusual international dimension to the cease-fire.
Framing the truce as a personal diplomatic achievement, Trump called on both sides to honor the agreement, emphasizing that the United States remained committed to preventing further escalation.
However, the rapid resumption of missile activity raised questions about the limits of external influence in containing deeply rooted hostilities.
Conclusion: A Precarious Peace
The cease-fire between Israel and Iran, brokered under the guidance of President Trump, remains highly tenuous.
While both governments publicly portray the agreement as a diplomatic success, renewed missile activity, conflicting reports, and ongoing distrust highlight the fragility of the truce.
For civilians in Israel, Iran, and neighboring countries, the situation underscores a sobering reality: peace can be fleeting in regions where historical grievances, strategic ambitions, and political calculations intersect.
As international observers, diplomats, and military officials monitor the situation, the world watches anxiously, aware that the fragile calm could collapse at any moment, plunging the region back into open conflict.
Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.
